PP funding for disadvantaged students – Summary and information
Our aim is to close, and ultimately eliminate, the gap that currently exists between Pupil Premium (PP) and Non-PP students.
In order to achieve this, we use pupil premium funding to address the barriers that exist for our disadvantaged students. Our current approach is summarised in the document below:
Click here to read the Pupil Premium Strategy for 2020-21.
We review our pupil premium strategy annually at the beginning of each academic year.
DOWNLOAD: Pupil Premium Parent Funding Application
Review of impact of PP interventions: Exam Outcomes / AttendanceA 3 year comparison between the performance of pupil premium (PP) and non-pupil premium (non PP) students in the key school exam and attendance measures |
||
| 2015-16 (7 students) | 2016-17 (17 students) | 2017-18 (17 students) |
| % achieving A*-C in English and maths | % achieving 4-9 in English and maths | % achieving 5+ A-C in En and Maths |
| PP: 57%
Non PP: 91% In school gap: -34% |
PP: 71%
Non PP: 92% In school gap: -21% |
PP: 58.82%
Non PP: 91% In school gap: -32.18% |
| Progress 8 | Progress 8 | Progress 8 |
| PP: +0.09
Non PP: +0.58 In school gap: -0.42 |
PP: +0.43
Non PP: +0.52 In school gap: -0.09 |
PP: -0.2
Non PP: +0.56 In school gap: -0.76 |
| Attainment 8 | Attainment 8
(new methodology for 2017) |
Attainment 8 |
| PP: 4.7
Non PP: 6.2 In school gap: -1.5 |
PP: 51.76
Non PP: 58.99 In school gap: -8.87 |
PP: 42.59
Non PP: 60.24 In school gap: -17.65 |
| % Attendance | % Attendance | % of unauthorised absence |
| PP Ave: 91.7%
Non PP Ave: 96.1% In-school gap: -4.4% |
PP Ave: 92.9%
Non PP Ave: 96.6% In-school gap: -3.8% |
PP Ave: 1.81%
Non PP Ave: 0.76% In-school gap: -1.05% |